Journal

Introduction — A simple food, but biologically exceptional

Eggs occupy a unique place in the human diet: universal, accessible, nutrient-dense — and yet repeatedly challenged over the decades. They have been celebrated as a “superfood”, then questioned because of their cholesterol content, before being progressively reappraised as research learned to distinguish dietary cholesterol from blood lipids, cardiovascular risk, and — above all — the role of the overall dietary pattern. This history illustrates a recurring methodological error: judging a food through a single parameter, as if one biomarker could summarise the physiological impact of a complex food matrix.

But an egg is not a “single-nutrient” food. It is a complete biological matrix, designed to support the development of a living organism. In other words: it does not merely deliver substrates (proteins, fats); it also provides structural building blocks (membranes), cofactors (vitamins and minerals essential for enzymatic function), and functional molecules capable of interacting with key pathways: muscle protein synthesis, membrane integrity, hepatic lipid transport, choline availability, carotenoid status, and certain cardiometabolic markers.

The best recent syntheses converge on one core idea: at the population level, there is no sufficiently robust evidence to justify discouraging egg consumption; observational findings are heterogeneous and strongly dependent on the dietary habits that accompany eggs. [1,2] The American Heart Association also emphasises that the relationship between dietary cholesterol, blood lipids and cardiovascular risk must be understood within a broader hierarchy — where overall dietary pattern (particularly saturated fats, carbohydrate quality, fibre intake, and degree of ultra-processing) weighs more heavily than any single food. [3]

So “miracle food?” deserves a more scientific reframing: what does the egg actually support at the cellular, metabolic and functional level — and in which contexts? In modern nutrition, the answer is never binary. It depends on the matrix, the terrain, the dietary combinations, and the goal (muscle, metabolism, cardiovascular health, functional ageing).

In other words
An egg should not be judged by a single number. It should be understood as a complete biological matrix, whose value depends on the broader dietary context and metabolic terrain — and whose relevance is measured by the coherence of the functions it supports. [1–3]

Chapter I — The egg as a biological matrix: a rare coherence of protein, lipids and micronutrients

An egg is not an arbitrary mix. It is organised into two complementary compartments:

• The white: primarily protein, with highly digestible proteins and a reserve of essential amino acids.
• The yolk: concentrated in structural lipids (including phospholipids), fat-soluble vitamins, carotenoids (lutein, zeaxanthin), and — crucially — choline.

This architecture explains a fundamental property: an egg does not deliver “isolated nutrients”; it delivers an integrated configuration. Reviews focused on eggs and cardiovascular health repeatedly stress this methodological point: the effects attributed to eggs cannot be interpreted properly without considering the food matrix and the context in which eggs are eaten. [1,2]

Biologically, this coherence is precisely what makes eggs interesting: cells rarely respond to a single nutrient; they respond to an environment of signals (energy availability, amino-acid availability, membrane lipid quality, micronutrient status), which influences:

• whether amino acids are channelled into protein synthesis or other uses,
• how membranes renew and maintain fluidity,
• the liver’s capacity to handle lipid flux (export, transport, metabolism),
• and, more broadly, post-meal metabolic stability (satiety and indirect insulin dynamics via the overall context).

In this reading, eggs are not merely “dense”: they are coherent, because their components complement one another functionally.

In other words
An egg is not the sum of its nutrients. It is a matrix designed to function as a whole: proteins + structural lipids + micronutrients + functional molecules — whose effects depend on dietary context. [1,2]

Chapter II — Protein and muscle: one of the strongest arguments for whole eggs

Eggs have long been considered a reference protein. But newer literature allows a more precise statement: whole eggs are not equivalent to egg whites, even when protein intake is comparable.

Key study: whole eggs vs egg whites after exercise [4]

Van Vliet et al. (AJCN, 2017) compared whole eggs with an isonitrogenous amount of egg whites immediately after resistance exercise. [4] The scientific value of this design is substantial: it tests a direct hypothesis — at equal protein intake, can the food matrix change the anabolic response?

Main finding: whole egg ingestion stimulated post-exercise myofibrillar protein synthesis more than egg whites alone, despite similar protein intake. [4]

Rigorous interpretation:

• This does not prove that “eggs build more muscle long-term” (that would be an extrapolation).
• It demonstrates something more fundamental: physiological response depends not only on grams of protein, but also on the lipid and micronutrient context delivered by the yolk (phospholipids, micronutrients, bioactive compounds), which may influence amino-acid utilisation and post-meal signalling. [4]

Practically, this supports a simple logic: systematically removing the yolk removes part of the matrix that appears to contribute to the food’s functional effectiveness. That matters in goals tied to functional ageing, where preserving muscle mass and recovery quality becomes decisive.

In other words
A whole egg is not “egg whites plus cholesterol”. It is a matrix that, at equal protein intake, can support a stronger post-exercise anabolic response than whites alone. [4]

Chapter III — Cholesterol and cardiovascular risk: what the best syntheses actually say

Eggs were long linked to fear of dietary cholesterol. Yet the relationship between cholesterol intake, blood cholesterol, and cardiovascular risk is more complex than a direct line — and strongly dependent on terrain, the rest of the diet, and the markers considered.

1) Institutional clarity: AHA 2020 [3]

The American Heart Association Science Advisory (2020) synthesises human evidence on dietary cholesterol, blood lipids and cardiovascular risk. [3] The key point (and the one that matters for eggs) is methodological: observational evidence does not support a stable, universal association between dietary cholesterol and cardiovascular risk, and guidance should prioritise improving the overall dietary pattern. [3]

2) Recent review focused on eggs and cardiovascular outcomes [1]

Carter et al. (2023) provide an updated synthesis of evidence on egg consumption and cardiovascular disease. [1] They report:

• mixed observational literature for mortality and cardiovascular events,
• strong heterogeneity between populations,
• and a recurring theme: observed associations often reflect how eggs are eaten (accompaniments, cooking methods, ultra-processing) rather than eggs per se. [1]

The operational conclusion is straightforward: when nutrition guidance focuses on overall dietary quality, eggs can fit coherently within a cardioprotective pattern — depending on individual terrain. [1,3]

3) Umbrella review 2025: higher-level synthesis [2]

Formisano et al. (2025) published an umbrella review (review of reviews) on egg consumption and multiple outcomes. [2] Their conclusion is structurally important: the overall strength of available evidence is judged “critically low”, and there is not enough to discourage egg consumption; eggs can be part of a healthy diet. [2]

This does not mean eggs are protective in all contexts. It does mean there is no strong scientific signal requiring avoidance “by principle”.

In other words
Current data do not support condemning eggs by default. Cardiovascular risk is driven primarily by the overall dietary pattern, and egg-related associations vary largely with consumption context. [1–3]

Chapter IV — Choline, liver, membranes: the major biological argument (and often the most underestimated)

If we look for what makes eggs particularly valuable, choline sits at the centre.

Choline is involved in:

• phosphatidylcholine synthesis (membranes),
• hepatic lipid transport (liver metabolism),
• neurotransmission (acetylcholine),
• and betaine production, linked to certain methylation pathways.

Western diets frequently deliver suboptimal choline, which makes naturally choline-rich foods especially relevant, particularly when the goal is to support structural (membranes) and metabolic (liver) functions.

Randomised crossover trial: 2 eggs/day in postmenopausal women [5]

Zhu et al. (2020) evaluated 2 eggs/day (vs a yolk-free substitute) in a randomised crossover trial in overweight postmenopausal women. [5] This study matters for two reasons:

• it tests a whole-food intervention in a controlled design,
• and it addresses a commonly mishandled topic: eggs, choline, microbiota and TMAO.

Main results: increased plasma choline and betaine, without a significant rise in TMAO in this protocol, and no major microbiota change observed. [5]
Rigorous read: eggs are an efficient choline/betaine source; the claim “eggs always raise TMAO” is not supported here.

Decisive comparison: supplemental choline vs choline via eggs [6]

Wilcox et al. (2021) compared supplemental choline (choline bitartrate) with high egg intake (4 eggs/day) on TMAO and platelet reactivity. [6] Their conclusion is conceptually central:

• choline supplements raised TMAO and platelet reactivity,
• whereas eggs, despite being rich in choline, did not produce a significant increase in TMAO or platelet reactivity under the conditions studied. [6]

What this demonstrates: the form and matrix of nutrient delivery change metabolic fate. Implication: judging eggs solely through choline (or cholesterol), as if the food were a capsule, is scientifically insufficient.

In other words
Choline is a major functional argument for whole eggs — and available trials suggest that choline delivered through a food matrix (eggs) does not behave like isolated choline supplements, particularly regarding TMAO-type markers. [5,6]

Chapter V — Lutein and zeaxanthin: eggs as a highly bioavailable carrier

Egg yolk contains two key carotenoids — lutein and zeaxanthin — associated with visual and retinal health. The specific interest of eggs is not only that they contain these compounds, but that they deliver them with high bioavailability, thanks to the yolk’s lipid matrix.

Trial in older adults: 1 egg/day for 5 weeks [7]

Goodrow et al. (2006) showed that one egg per day for five weeks significantly increased serum lutein and zeaxanthin in older adults, without increasing serum lipids in that protocol. [7]

This supports a practical point: eggs can raise circulating carotenoids effectively — something not guaranteed with carotenoid-rich foods when absorption is limited by insufficient dietary lipids.

In other words
Eggs do not merely “contain” carotenoids — they deliver them efficiently, thanks to the yolk’s lipid matrix, as reflected in circulating levels. [7]

Chapter VI — Inflammation: what trials suggest (without overreach)

The notion that eggs are intrinsically pro-inflammatory is not consistently supported by clinical data. Controlled trials tend to show neutral or context-dependent effects.

Eggs and inflammation: controlled data in a metabolic terrain [8]

Ballesteros et al. (2015) investigated effects of egg intake on markers including inflammation-related parameters within a controlled comparison. [8] The value here is that it brings experimental data to a topic often handled by assumption.

Rigorous read:

• these findings do not prove eggs are “anti-inflammatory” in all contexts,
• but they do support a useful conclusion: when eaten within a coherent dietary context, eggs do not behave as a pro-inflammatory food by nature. [2,8]

In other words, the meaningful question is not “are eggs inflammatory?”, but: in what dietary pattern are they embedded?

In other words
Available trials do not validate the idea of eggs being intrinsically pro-inflammatory. Effects appear to depend primarily on terrain and the overall dietary context. [2,8]

Chapter VII — Type 2 diabetes: the most heterogeneous area, requiring method

Egg–diabetes literature is where heterogeneity is most pronounced across regions.

Wallin 2016: prospective study + dose–response meta-analysis [9]

Wallin et al. (2016) reported that an association between frequent egg intake and type 2 diabetes risk appears mainly in some US cohorts, and not in other settings (including their Swedish cohort). [9] A plausible explanation is explicitly noted: egg-associated eating patterns differ substantially between countries, which can drive divergent observational results. [9]

Drouin-Chartier 2020: updated synthesis [10]

Drouin-Chartier et al. (2020) published a major updated analysis reporting no overall association between moderate egg intake and type 2 diabetes risk, while again highlighting regional differences (US vs Europe vs Asia), likely reflecting consumption context. [10]

Methodological conclusion:

• the “diabetes signal” does not justify a blanket condemnation of eggs,
• it demands a pattern-based reading, especially in high metabolic-risk individuals.

In other words
On diabetes, evidence does not support a universal rule. Observed associations vary largely with the dietary patterns that accompany egg consumption, which requires contextual interpretation. [9,10]

Chapter VIII — Synthesis: why eggs deserve a special status

The most defensible, robust points are:

• Whole eggs offer a more coherent biological matrix than whites alone, and may stimulate a stronger post-exercise anabolic response at equivalent protein intake. [4]
• Recent high-level syntheses do not provide sufficient evidence to discourage eggs in the general population; heterogeneity mainly reflects consumption context. [1,2]
• Reference guidance stresses that dietary cholesterol must be interpreted within the hierarchy of overall dietary pattern quality. [3]
• Choline and the yolk’s lipid matrix are a major functional advantage, with trials suggesting that egg-derived choline does not behave like isolated supplemental choline for TMAO-type outcomes. [5,6]
• Eggs are an effective and bioavailable carrier for lutein and zeaxanthin. [7]
• The diabetes question remains the most heterogeneous; the best meta-analyses suggest no overall association for moderate intake, with regional differences likely pattern-driven. [9,10]

What emerges is a clear hierarchy: eggs are neither “risky” nor “protective” by nature. They are a high-value functional matrix whose effects depend on terrain and dietary context.

In other words
Eggs deserve a special status because they combine matrix coherence, micronutrient density and an evidence base broadly compatible with a healthy diet — while still requiring a context-based reading (cardio, diabetes). [1–7,9,10]

Conclusion — A miracle food? Almost.

“Almost” — not as a promise, but as a biological statement: eggs are one of the rare foods that naturally combine high-quality protein, structural lipids, fat-soluble micronutrients, bioavailable carotenoids and choline within a coherent matrix — with recent syntheses that do not justify excluding them by default in the general population. [1–7]

Eggs are not a standalone solution. They do not replace dietary coherence, lifestyle, or individual metabolic terrain. But when integrated into a high-quality pattern — rich in fibre and plants, with good lipid quality and low ultra-processing — they are a remarkably functional food: simple, yet biologically sophisticated. [1–3,5–7]

In other words
Eggs are not “miracle” because they cure. They are almost exceptional because they concentrate, within a coherent matrix, structural and functional elements that matter for cellular biology — and the current evidence does not support avoiding them by principle for the general population. [1–7]

Bibliography

[1] Carter, S. et al. (2023) Eggs and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: An Update of Recent Evidence.
PMC: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10285014/
PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37219706/

[2] Formisano, E. et al. (2025) Effect of egg consumption on health outcomes: An updated umbrella review…
PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39934049/
ScienceDirect: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939475325000031

[3] Carson, J.A.S. et al. (2020) Dietary Cholesterol and Cardiovascular Risk: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association. Circulation.
AHA: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000743
PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31838890/

[4] van Vliet, S. et al. (2017) Consumption of whole eggs promotes greater stimulation of postexercise muscle protein synthesis… The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.
PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28978542/

[5] Zhu, C. et al. (2020) Whole egg consumption increases plasma choline and betaine without affecting TMAO levels…
PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32464420/
ScienceDirect: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0271531720302669

[6] Wilcox, J. et al. (2021) Dietary Choline Supplements, but Not Eggs, Raise Fasting TMAO Levels…
PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33872583/
PMC: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8410632/

[7] Goodrow, E.F. et al. (2006) Consumption of one egg per day increases serum lutein and zeaxanthin…
PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16988120/

[8] Ballesteros, M.N. et al. (2015) One Egg per Day Improves Inflammation… in Diabetic Patients. Nutrients.
MDPI: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/7/5/3449
PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25970149/

[9] Wallin, A. et al. (2016) Egg consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: a prospective study and dose–response meta-analysis. Diabetologia.
PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26993632/
PMC: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4861752/

[10] Drouin-Chartier, J.P. et al. (2020) Egg consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes… and an updated meta-analysis…
PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32453379/
PMC: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7458776/